CCS
CCS Events
CCS Libraries
About CCS
CCS Projects
BRICS
CCS Highlights


Publication Details

Reference
Buccus, Imraan & Nadvi, Lubna  (2006) Resisting the Anti-terrorism bill: The role of civil society in legislative reform. Centre for Civil Society : 1-13.

Summary
INTRODUCTION
The South African civil society response to the recently tabled Protection of Constitutional Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Bill (2004), known initially as the Anti-Terrorism Bill (ATB), raises a number of critical questions around the effectiveness of public participation in resisting a controversial bill appearing before parliament for consideration. The outcomes of this particular process have implications for how civil society may respond to similarly proposed legislation in future.

This paper attempts to analyse the nature and context of the public’s engagement with the ATB, by firstly tracing very briefly, its history, and then examining the levels of resistance to the bill, and the interesting civil society dynamics that emerged from the various national alliances that were formed in an effort to respond to the bill. We will argue that this process was somewhat unprecedented in the post 1994 period, particularly within the context of broader civil society participation in the formation of government policy on an issue of such critical national significance. It was unprecedented because never before has there been such a concerted effort by civil society to reform or reject a particular piece of legislation.

Moreover, this paper will attempt to understand the reasons that people participated in particular ways, honing in on their differences and similarities. In particular we will argue that participation in this process can be broadly divided into two distinct categories. One being primarily faith based, i.e. the Muslim community and the second, a loose coalition of journalists, unionists, NGOs and activists. This distinction does not reflect the view that there was no confluence of engagement between these groupings, rather that submissions on the bill were generally made along specific group interests. The paper will also look broadly at the effectiveness of their participation as an exercise in advancing democracy and civil liberties, as well as the specific group interests alluded to earlier.

It could be argued that the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001 served as a catalyst for many countries, particularly the US and the United Kingdom, and South Africa at a later stage, to consider introducing additional legislation to deal with terrorism. In the case of SA, the government’s argument that the then ATB would bring our country in line with similar international legislation was met with public anger and discontent from time of the introduction of the draft bill in 2002. The resistance stemmed primarily from the fact that draconian powers would be given to our law enforcement agencies to investigate and deal with acts of terror. This in itself recalls the dark days of apartheid where state repression in South Africa resulted in liberation movements being labelled as terrorist groups, and being persecuted through the various organs of the state. The vague description of ‘terrorism’ further fanned fears that the ATB would seriously impact on civil liberties such as the freedom of association, expression, assembly and demonstration.

Given also the experiences of the Muslim and other minority communities in the US, in the wake of such legislation being introduced, illustrated the dangers of these laws being effected and the South African public was understandably nervous about having its own civil liberties curtailed yet again, after years of such treatment under apartheid.

These incidences in the US and elsewhere clearly provided sufficient motivation for those groups feeling potentially most affected, to act. As a result, South African Muslims, together with a range of other interest groups such as COSATU, one of the country’s largest labour union federations, were propelled to undertake a sustained campaign to challenge and engage the government on this bill. What followed was arguably a rare and intriguing partnership forged between faith-based and other non-governmental interest groups, to tackle an issue, which would inevitably affect them and their activities.

 cast your net a little wider...
 Radical Philosophy 
 AFRICAN ENVIROMENTAL JUSTICE DOCUMENTARY FILMS 
 African Studies Association (USA)  
 New Dawn Engineering 
 Wikipedia 
 Indymedia Radio 
 Southern Africa Report online 
 Online Anti Apartheid Periodicals, 1960 - 1994 
 Autonomy & Solidarity 
 New Formulation 
 We Write 
 International Journal of Socialist Renewal 
 Theoria 
 Journal of African Philosophy 
 British Library for Development Studies 
 The Nordic Africa Institute Online Library 
 Political Economy Research Institute Bulletin (PERI) 
 Feminist Africa 
 Jacques Depelchin's Tribute to Harold Wolpe 
 Chimurenga 
 African Studies Quarterly 
 The Industrial Workers of the World 
 Anarchist Archives 
 Wholewheat Radio 
 Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa  
 Zanon Workers 
 Public Citizen  
 Open Directory Project 
 Big noise films 
 London Review of Books  
 New York Review of Books 
 Monthly Review 
 New Left Review 
 Bureau of Public Secrets  
 Zed Books 
 Pluto Press 
 Duke University Press  
 Abe Books 
 The Electric Book Company 
 Project Guttenberg 
 Newspeak Dictionary 
 Feral Script Kiddies 
 Go Open Source 
 Source Forge 
 www.kiarchive.ru 
 Ubuntu Linux Home Page 
 Software for Apple Computers 



|  Contact Information  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy