CCS Events
CCS Libraries
About CCS
CCS Projects
CCS Highlights

Publication Details

Bond, Patrick Translation ka-Manzi, Faith (2014) SA: 20 years on, ‘very good story’ of ANC ‘social democracy’ needs tough questioning
(INingizimu Afrika: Eminyakeni engu20, ‘udaba oluhle kakhulu’ ngoKhongolose ‘kwinhlalakahle yokubuswa ngentando yeningi’ oludinga imibuzo ejulile). Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal : -.


Patrick Bond 2 May 2014

Two decades ago, liberation was won in South Africa. In two weeks, the May 7 election will confirm the popularity of the African National Congress (ANC) with a landslide victory.

But times are changing: a serious leftist party – the Economic Freedom Fighters founded by ousted ANC youth leader Julius Malema – has appeared on the landscape and the largest trade union, the 340,000-strong National Union of Mineworkers of South Africa (NUMSA), has refused to support the ANC on grounds that it has sold out, especially in the wake of the August 2012 Marikana massacre of mineworkers by police on behalf of the platinum mining corporation Lonmin.

What kind of patronage system now exists to help explain why the ANC gets votes in spite of disastrous pro-business economic policies that worsened already world-leading inequality and unemployment after 1994? Post-apartheid social policy – especially 15 million new monthly grants, mainly for the mothers of poor children – is the main plot within what President Jacob Zuma calls the ANC’s “very good story”. In reality, it’s a tall tale of tokenism, once we get to know the devil in the details.

Government has adopted “a northern European approach to social development”, according to Alan Hirsch in Season of Hope, the main insider survey of post-apartheid policy to date. Aside from welfare grants, the provision of free basic water and roll-out of essential services are also the stuff of wild claims by the government and its backers, including the South African Institute of Race Relations.

The claim that we have an operative social democracy is contradicted by the relatively small amount spent on grants: R118 billion (US$10.9 billion) in 2013/14 against an expected R2.1 trillion (US$194 billion) GDP. If we were really Northern European in approach, that spending would rise by a factor of nearly five.

Among the world’s 40 largest economies, South Africa spends more on society in relation to GDP than only India, China, Mexico and South Korea, in spite of having much higher inequality. The ANC government spends less than half as much as do Brazil and Russia in relative terms, according to a 2011 survey by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

This sort of tokenism in social policy occurs not because the government has hit a fiscal ceiling. Overall, the public sector’s annual deficit and total domestic debt are relatively modest in comparison to peer economies.

Even if the state appears under-committed in fiscal terms, the grants do buy loyalty, it seems. Small as they may be in aggregate, the monthly grants are by no means tokenistic to recipients: the poor who are elderly or severely disabled (R1350 or $125) or kids (R310 – $29 – to low-income mothers and R830 or $77 for foster caregivers). Still, they keep recipients just below or hovering around a poverty line; the poverty rate hasn’t budged since 1994.

These social grants were inherited from the apartheid regime, but then were shrunk and widened. They widened because most of them are no longer limited to race groups exclusive of black Africans; after 2000 (a bit late in the day), the extension of child grants to low-income Africans explains the massive rise in recipients. But the grants shrunk; they’ve fallen in real (inflation-adjusted) terms since 1994 – and if one converts to US dollars to compare internationally, the miserly child grant now is around 40 per cent lower than 1994’s level.

The lack of generosity is a function of procedures established to keep the poor at bay, such as “indigency” conditions. As a result, spending on social transfers rose by only around 3 per cent of GDP since 1994. Putting on the brake was a political choice, for when rebooting the child welfare system in 1997, the government’s Lund Committee complained that “fiscal discipline imposed by the government’s macroeconomic growth strategy makes it impossible to reach all poor children”.

The underlying problem remains “Washington consensus” policies adopted by the National Party in the late 1980s and amplified by the ANC government after 1994. Excessive mechanisation and industry-wrecking imports left businesses unwilling to create jobs. This unwillingness has nothing to do with an “inflexible” labour market, as is often alleged, because among the 40 largest economies, only New Zealand, the US, Canada, England, Australia, Chile, Saudi Arabia and Brazil make it easier to fire workers than here.
Instead, it reflects the neoliberal Treasury’s excessive power and its propensity towards austerity. Pretoria’s capacity to serve its citizenry steadily fell in comparison to the size of the economy, with government general services as a share of GDP falling from 16.2 per cent in 1994 to 13.7 per cent in 2012. The share of GDP spent on the mainly state functions of electricity, gas and water also fell, from 3.5 per cent to 1.8 per cent of GDP from 1994 to 2012.

What happens within state expenditures is also critical: social-grant spending was, over time, less progressive – i.e., less directed to the poorest – in 2006 than in 1995, by quite substantial amounts, according to Stellenbosch economist Servaas van der Berg. Moreover, Treasury has directed far more funding to meet capital’s needs. Most of the economic infrastructure created through taxation – roads, rails and other transport, industrial districts, the world’s cheapest electricity until recently, R&D subsidies, etc. – overwhelmingly benefits business and its shareholders, as do many tax loopholes. Corporate welfare is rampant.

The delivery of social services is also under pressure due to privatisation. One recent result was the apparently corrupt R10 billion ($930 million) outsourcing of a benefits-payment system to Net1 (a Nasdaq New York-listed multinational), which bilked recipients with phone airtime overcharging and a usurious loan scheme. The situation is so extreme that even the Constitutional Court recommended a re-tender last week.

As Rhodes professor Jane Duncan recently observed:
The very act of placing public functions in private hands means that social security inevitably becomes debased by the profit motive. South Africa’s social security-dependent poor are a massive captive market for profit-seeking companies. In the name of efficiency, the SA Social Security Agency has entrusted the administration of millions of South Africans’ livelihoods to a private sector that appears to be more concerned about lining its own pockets than serving the poor and vulnerable.

These are uncomfortable facts for defenders of South Africa’s social policy, and are rarely addressed. By ignoring the left critique, those to the ANC’s right can firmly hint that enough is enough on social spending. South African Institute of Race Relations director Frans Cronje, for example, has been cited approvingly not only by natural allies at Business Day, but also recently by public service minister Lindiwe Sisulu and even by South African Communist Party leader Blade Nzimande.

I have written to Cronje on several occasions asking him for more rigour in his analysis, but invariably end up disappointed. For example, in 2012 he claimed:

A myth has taken hold in South Africa that service delivery was a failure. However research we have published over the past several years suggests that this is not the case.

Right then, I asked Cronje, “do you have data on service delivery not just in terms of the capital investment and services installation, but also service standards (e.g. flush toilet in contrast to pit latrine) and the operations and maintenance of services, e.g. pricing, breakdowns, disconnections and other service disruptions?” The reply: “All good questions. Truth is few answers exist in SA. Would have to do the field work to establish the answer.”

Though calling itself “South Africa’s leading research and policy organisation”, the South African Institute of Race Relations never did the field work, and instead, Cronje lauds the ANC for raising the rate of access to water pipes to 89 per cent of the population (Zuma recently claimed 95%, the ANC posters claim 92%, whatever). But the state itself admits that the water access rate falls to 65 per cent if you expect water to actually flow through the pipes.

If you then ask where the pipes are located (e.g. within 200 metres, which often means no more than one tap per thousand people in a typical shack settlement?), then the genuine access rate falls further, probably well below 50 per cent, since water minister Edna Molewa appears uncommitted to satisfying the medium-term Reconstruction and Development Programme goal of on-site water supply for all.

Such merely tokenistic social policies leave many ordinary people infuriated, but they satisfy those with power, wealth and strong status-quo orientations (no matter their declared ideology). “In terms of basic services and welfare, the ANC has done better than it often understands”, asserted Cronje in January – making it utterly illogical for the masses to protest on average 35 times a day, of which more than five per day are “violent” according to the most recent “Gatherings Act incidents” reported by the South African Police Service (my sense from working this beat as an academic is that there is serious under-reporting by SAPS). But Cronje told Business Day in January that there are fewer than four protests per day. I questioned him on the discrepancy with SAPS, but no reply.

And in 2012 Cronje also pronounced that “the proportion of South Africans living on less than $2/day has declined from 12 per cent in 1994, and a peak of 17 per cent in 2002, to just 5 per cent today”. Last month, even Stats SA had to sheepishly admit the figure is 46 per cent. I respectfully questioned Cronje about this divergence; again, silence.

There is one very good South African social policy story, to be sure: the rise in life expectancy from 52 to 61 in the last decade. But this gain is not government’s to claim. Without the Treatment Action Campaign’s struggle starting in early 1999, 6 million HIV+ South Africans would have had no hope of getting access to life-saving medicines. Furious HIV+ people fought for their lives against a national health policy termed “genocidal” at the time by the heads of the Medical Research Council (Malegapuru Makgoba), South African Medical Association (Kgosi Letlape) and Pan Africanist Congress health desk (Costa Gazi).

The battle for free generic (not branded) AIDS medicines was won by activists against Big Pharma, the Bill Clinton-Al Gore government in Washington, the World Trade Organization, intellectual property rights in general and the ANC leadership team of Thabo Mbeki, health minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang and trade minister Alec Erwin. That is indeed a very very good story to tell, certainly the best news from South Africa since April 1994. But then the logical question would follow: how many of Zuma’s current cabinet spoke out against Mbeki when it mattered? Hmmm.

So South Africa’s healthcare is often inspiring from below, but too often paralysed from above. For example, when it comes to the badly needed National Health Insurance scheme promised by the ANC back in 2007 at the ruling party’s Polokwane conference and only haltingly implemented in inappropriate micro pilot projects in the country’s poorest neighbourhoods, we can again point to Treasury as the saboteur. For how much money did finance minister Pravin Gordhan allocate to assist minister Aaron Motsoaledi in ending health-insurance apartheid? Next to nada.

There are so many other ways that the Treasury reproduces class apartheid – e.g. through tax, inflation and interest rate policies, exchange control liberalisation, corporate tax cuts, massive export-oriented infrastructure and other white elephant projects – that it is really no surprise to learn from the World Economic Forum that over the past two years, South Africa’s working class is rated the world’s most militant. Or to learn that PricewaterhouseCoopers recently assessed the South African capitalist class to be the world’s most fraudulent. Or that the World Bank calculates that South Africa is way atop the world inequality rankings.

The Marikana massacre was just one of thousands of strikes, protests and violent confrontations with a police force willing to take extraordinary steps to defend capital’s property rights and state elites. Earlier this year, nine service delivery protesters were killed by police using live ammunition. Five of these cases were close to Marikana, where activists were confronted by the same police force which still awaits punishment for the premeditated massacre of 34 workers (and injuries to 78), planting evidence on corpses and torturing 44 of the arrested miners.

If the ANC’s bragging about its social policy continues without substantial reforms, then long into the future, violent protests will continue rising. The ANC’s neoliberal-tokenistic social policy, along with failed macroeconomic policy, allowed racial apartheid to decisively transform into class apartheid twenty years ago. But a new anti-apartheid movement is rising quickly: a class struggle with enormous potential.

Patrick Bond’s new co-authored book (with John Saul) is South Africa:The present as history (James Currey and Jacana publishers, 2014

INingizimu Afrika: Eminyakeni engu20, ‘udaba oluhle kakhulu’ ngoKhongolose ‘kwinhlalakahle yokubuswa ngentando yeningi’ oludinga imibuzo ejulile

INingizimu Afrika ihlale ikhungethwe iziteleka eziyizinkulungwane, imibhikilisho kanye nokubhekana ngeziqu okwenzeka minyaka yonke kanye nombutho wamaphoyisa ahlale ezimisele ukuthatha amagxathu anzima ukuvika amalungelo ezakhiwo enkulumbuso yelelizwe.

NguPatrick Bond, eThekwini Yahunyushwa nguFaith ka-Manzi

Eminyakeni engamashumi amabili edlule, inkululeko yagcina ifikile eNingizimu Afrika. Emasontweni amabili azayo, ngelanga langomhlaka 7 ngoMeyi ukhetho luyoqonisekisa udumo lukaKhongolose ngokuphumelela ngamavoti amaningi kakhulu.

Kodwa-ke izikhathi ziyashintsha: njengoba sekuqubuke iqembu elizimisele kakhulu lezishoshovu - iEconomic Freedom Fighters elibunjwe nguJulius Malema owayengumholi weqembu labasha likaKhongolose – osebonakala kwezombusazwe kanti futni okuyiyona nyunyana enkulukazi , enamalunga angu340 000 phecelezi iNational Union of Mineworkers of South Africa yabasebenzi bezinsimbi, inqabile ukuxhasa uKhongolose ngoba ithi udayise ngabantu bakuleli, ikakhulukazi uma sekubukwa isibhicongo esenzeka eMarikana lapho abasebenzi basezimayini basocongwa ngamaphoyisa ethunyelwe izikhulu zemboni yeplatinum, iLonmin.

Ngabe inhloboni yokuxhasa ekhona njengamanje engasize ukuchaza ukuthi kungani uKhongolose athole amavoti phezu kokuba unemigomo engemihle ehambisana mayelana nokuhweba okwenza isimo sashuba kakhulu ngokuthi zwe lethu kube yilo elihamba phambili mayelana nokungalingani kakhulu ngamazinga empilo kwabantu kanye okungabikhona kwemisebenzi emva konyaka ka1994? Umgomo mayelana nezenhlalakahle emva kokuguqiswa phansi kombuso wobandlululo – ikakhulukazi imali yesibonelelo entsha yabayizigidi eziyishumi nanhlanu njalo ngenyanga, kakhulukazi komama bezingane zinhlwempu – kwanguyiqhinga likaMongameli uGedleyihlekisa Zuma lokuthi abize lokhu ‘njengodaba oluhle kakhulu’ likaKhongolose. Emepeleni, lokhu kungukujabulisa abantu kwesikhashana, uma sesibhekana neqiniso.

Uhulumeni wavele wanquma ukulandela ‘’izindlela amazwe asentshonalange abhekana ngayo mayelana nokuthuthukiswa kwezehlalakahle’’, ngokusho kukaAlan Hirsch kwiSeason of Hope, okunguyena ongaphakathi kwezombuso owenze ucwaningo mayelana nomgomo owenzewe emva kokuqunjwa phansi kombuso wobandlululo kuze kube manje. Ngaphandle kwemali yezibonelelo, ukunikezwa kwamanzi amahala kanye nokulethwa kwezinye izidingo ezibalulekile kukhona nehaba eliye lenziwe nguhulumeni nabalandeli bakhe, ikakhulukazi isikhungo esaziwa ngeSouth African Institute of Race Relations.

Bathi sinezenhlalakhle zombuso wentando yeningi esebenzayo ephikiswa yimali encane kakhulu ekhishwayo yezibonelelo: uR118 billioni phakathi konyaka ka2013 noka2014 uma sekuqhathaniswa nekyayifanele isetshenziswe enguR2.1 trillion kwimali elawula lelizwe phecelezi GDP.Umangabe senzisa okwamazwe aseNtshonalanga, ngabe ukusebenzisa izimali kunganyuka kahle kucishe kufike kumazinga amahlanu.

Kumazwe angamashumi amane eminotho emikhulukazi emhlabeni jikelele, iNingizimu Afrika ichitha kakhulu imali emphakathini uma sekubhekenwe neGDP ngaphandle kweIndia, neChina, neMexico kanye neSouth Korea, nomgangabe-ke inesibalo esikhulu samazinga okungalingani kwabantu. Uhulumeni kaKhongolose uchitha imali encane kunengxenye njengoba kwenzeka eBrazil kanye naseRussia uma sekuqhathaniswa, ngokocwaningo olwenziwa ngonyaka ka2011 yOrganisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Lokukwenzelela mayelana nemigomo yezenhlalakahle kwenzeka hayi ngoba uhulumeni usuke esentula ezentela. Kukhokonke, ukuncishiswa akukho ngaphezulu kakhulu uma kubhekwana neminye iminotho ecishe ifane neyakuleli. kwezimali ezibhekelele ezemiphakathi njalo ngonyaka kanye nesikweletu sasezweni.

Noma-ke uhulumeni ebonakala engazibophezele ngokwanele mayelana nokusebenzisa imali yentela, kubonakala sengathi imali yesibonelelo yenza babe nabantu ababathembayo. Noma-ke bebancane ngokwesibalo, isibonelelo sezinyanga zonke akuyona imali ewubla kulabo abayamukelayo: abampofu abadala kanye nalabo abakhubazeke kakhulu (R1350) noma izingane (R310) – kuya komama abahola kancane kanye nalabo abanakekela izingane zingenabazali abathola uR830. Kodwa-ke futhi bayaqhubeka laba abamukela lemali yesibonelelo ngokuphila ngaphansi kwengcindezi yobuphofu; izinga lobuphofualikanyakazi kusukela ngonyaka ka1994.

Lemali yesibonelelo yezenhlalakahle iqhamuka kuhulumeni wobandlululo, kodwa manje esingcishisiwe futhi yandiswa. Yandiswa ngoba ayisagxilile-nje kuphela kwibala elilodwa labamnyama kodwa kuwowonke; emva kuka200 (emva kokuhamba kwesikhathi), ukwandiswa kwesibonelelo kwizingane kulaba amaholo phansi emancane abamnyama, kwanyuka kakhulu isibalo salabo abamukela lemali. Kodwa-ke lemali yesibonelelo yancipha kusukela ngo1994 ngenxa ye-inflation – futhi umja umuntu eyishintsha iya kumadola aseMelika ukuyiqhathanisa nemali yesibonelelo ekhishwa emhlabeni wonke, imali yesibonelelo ezinganeni isiyehle ngmaphesenti angamashumi amane kunesikhathi sangonyak aka1994.

Ukungabi khona nokunikelela ngozwelo kungumsebenzi wezindlela eigciniwe ukuthi abampofu bahlale bangasondeli, njengezimo ezifana ‘’nokweswela’’. Umphumela walokhu-ke, ukuthi ukuchitha kwezimali mayelana nokuse=henxisa ezezenhlalakahle kwanyuka ngamaphesenti amathathu kuphela ngeGDP kusukela ngonyaka ka1994. Ukufaka amabhuleki kwakungukuzikhethela okwenziwa umbusazwe, ngoba ngesikhathi beqala kabusha inqubo yezenhlalakahle ezinganeni ngonyaka ka1997, ikomodi lika Lund likahulumeni lkhononda ngokuthi ‘’indlela uhulumeni ayelawula ngayo ezentela mayelana nokukhula kwezomnotho kwizwelonke kwakwenza kube nzima ukufinyelela kuzozonke izingane”.

Inkinga engekho obala mayelana nalokhu kusalokhu kuyimigomo ‘’nesivumelwano esenziwa neWashington’’ yiqembu lamaNashinali sekuphela iminyaka yama1980 futhi kwadunyiswa nguhulumeni kaKhongolose emva kuka1994. Ukuthengwa kwakhulu kwemushini kanye nokulandwa kwezimpahla kakhulu emazweni aphesheya kwenza abahwebi bangazimisela ukudala imisebenzi. Lokungazimiseli kwakungahlangene nezezimakethe zabasebenzi ‘’ezazingavulelekile’’, njengoba kuhlale kushiwo, ngoba amazwe eminotho emikhulukazi angu40, iNew Zealand, neMelika, neCanada, neNgilandi, neAustralia, neChile, neSaudi Arabia kanye neBrazil abenza kube lula kakhulu ukuxosha abasebenzi kunalelizwe.

Esikhundleni salokho, kubonakalisa amandla amakhulu esikhwama sesizwe sikahulumeni wongxiwankulu kanye nomkhuba waso wokenza kube nzima ukusebenzisa izimali. Ukukwazi kwePitoli ukusebenzela izakhamuzi zalo kwehla kancane uma sekuqhathansiwa nobukhulu bezomnotho, futhi izidingo zikahulumeni eziyingxenye yeGDP zehla kusukela kumaphesenti angu16.1 ngonyaka ka1994 kuya kwangu13.7 ngo2012. Okwakuyingxenye yeGDP owakusetshenziswa emisebenzini kakhulu kukagesi, igesi kanye namanzi nakho futhi kwehla, kusukela kumaphesenti angu3.5 kuya kwangu1.8 yeGDP kusukela ngo1994 kuya ku2012.

Okwenzekayo mayelana nokusetshenziswa kwezimali zikahulumeni kubalulekile;ukusentshenziswa kwezimali zesibonelelo kwasekuthuthuka kancene, ngokuhamba kwesikhathi - okusho ukuthi, kwase kubhekiswe kwabahlupheka kakhulu - ngnyak ka2006 kunonyaka ka1995, ngezimali ezinkulu, ngokusho kukachwepheshe wezomnotho waseStellenbosch uServaas van der Berg. Okunye-ke futhi, Isikhwama Semali Yezwe uhambise kakhulu imali ekubhekeleleni izidingo zongxiwankulu. Izingqalasizinda eziningi ezidalwe ngenxa yentela – imigwaqo, imizila yezitimela kanye nezinye ezokuthutha, izindawo zezimboni, amandla kagesi shibe ukudla wonke amazwe emhlabeni jikelele kuze kube manje, ezokuxhaswa zeR&D, kanye nokunye okuzuzisa kakhulu amahwebi kanye nabahlanganyela nabo, njengoba kwenzeka lapho kunezikhala khona ngezentela. Inhlalakahle yezimboni iyona egcwele kakhulu.

Ukulethwa kwezidingo zenhlalakahle kungaphansi kwengcindezi ngenxa yokwenziwa kokuningi ngezasese. Njengoba usolwazi wesikhungo semfundo ephakeme yaseRhodes uJane Duncan esanda kuqaphela: Indaba yokuthi misebenzi yemiphakathi ibekwe ezandleni zangasese kusgo ukuthi ukuvikeleka ngezenhlalakahle kugcina kwehliswe isithunzi ngenxa ysizathu sokufuna inzuzo. Ukuvikeleka kwezenhlalakahle yabampofu baseNingizimu Afrik bayiziboshwa zezimboni ezifuna ukwenza inzuzo. Ngoba kuthiwa kufunwa ukwenziwa yonke into ngobunono, uPhiko Lokuvikela Ezenhlalakahle lwaseNingizimu Afrika (phecelezi iS.A. Social Security Agency) ibeke ithemba ekulawulweni kwezigidigidi zabantu baseNingizimu Afrika kwizimboni zangasese ezibonakala zinendaba kakhulu nokuhlohla imali emaphaketheni azo kunokusiza abampofu kanye nabaswele.

Lawa ngamaqiniso angehli kahle kwabavikela umgomo wezenhlalakahle waseNingizimu Afrika, futhi okungewona amaqiniso okuhlale kukhlunywa ngawo. Ngokuziba lokhu kugxekwa yizishoshsovu, laba abangontamolukhuni kuKhongolose bavele baqinise amakhanad kwenziwe ngokwanela manje mayelana nokuchithwa kwezimali kwezenhlalakahle. Umqondisi wesikhungo iSouth African Institute of Race Relations uFrans Cronje, ngokwesibonelo-nje, useke wezwakala ngokuxhaswa hayi-nje ngobhululu bakhe kwiphephandaba iBusiness Day, kodwa muve-nje ngisho nawungqongqoshe wezenhlalakahle uLindiwe Sisulu, kanye ngisho nomholi weqembu lamaKhomanisi laseNingizimu Afrika uBlade Nzimande.

Ngike ngabhalele uCronje izikhathi ezimbalwa ngithi akathi ukujula mayelana nokuhlaziya kwakhe, kodwa njalo ngigcina ngiphoxekile, Okwesibonelo-nje, ngonyak ka2012 wathi: Inkolelo egcwele kakhulu eNingizimu Afrika ukuthi ukulethwa kwezidingo kubantu akuphumelelanga. Kodwa ucwaningo esesilwenzile kuleminyaka edlule ikhombisa ukuthi akunjalo

Kulungile-ke, sengibuza uCronje, “ngabe unezibalo mayelana nokulethwa kweziding hayi-nje ezincike kwemali esetshenzisiwe kanye nokwenziwe, kodwa nezinga lokulethwa kwezidingo (njengezindlu zangasese ezinamanzi ahambayo kunalawo emigodi) kanye nokwakhiwa kanye nokunakekelwa kwalezizidingo, isibonelo-nje amanani, ukuphuka kwezinsiza, ukuvalwa kwamanzi nogesi kanye nokuphazamiseka kokulethwa kwezinsiza?” Imjpendulo engayithola yilena: Imibuzo emihle yonke lena. Iqiniso ukuthi zimbalwa izimpendulo ezikhona eNingizimu Afrika. Kungafanele siphumele ngaphandle kubantu ukuze sazi impendulo.”

Noma-ke bezibiza ‘’Ngenhlangano ehamba phambili ngokucwaninga kanye nemigomo’’, iSouth African Institute of Race Relations ayikaze iphumele ngaphandle ibuze abantu, kodwa esikhundleni salokho, uCronje incoma uKhongolose ngokunyusa isibalo sabantu abafakelwe amapayipi amanzi safika kumaphesenti angu89 kwizwelonke (uZuma yena usanda kuthi lesosibalo singamaphesenti angu95, kodwa manje izingqwembe ezinxenxela banatu ukuthi bavotele leliqembu zona zithi amaphesenti angu92, asisazi-ke ngempela okuyikonakona). Kodwa uhulumeni uqobo uyavuma ukuthi ukutholwa kwabantu amanzi ahlanzekile kwehle kwafika kumaphesenti angu65 umangabe ngempela ulindele lawomanzi ahambe ngamapayipi.

Uma-ke ubuza ukuthi wona lamapayipi akuphi (ngokwesibonele-nje mhIawumbe kusukela kumamaitha angamakhulu amabili lapho kuhlala khona abantu, okuchaza ukuthi umpompi owodwa usetshenziswa ngabantu abayinkulungwane njengoba kwenzeka lapho kuhlala khona abantu emijondolo?), ngakho-ke isibalo sangempela siyehla, mhlawumbe ngaphansi kwamaphesenti angu50, njengoba ungqongqoshe wamanzi uEdna Molewa ebonakala engenakho ukuzimisela ngokwanelisa umgomo wesikhashana seRecontsriction and Development Programme sokulethela abantu bonke ezindlini zabo.

Lemigomo yezenhlalakahle yokwenzelela isikhashana ishiya abantukazana bediniwe, kodwa yanelisa labo abayiziphathimandla, abacebile kanye nabadumile (noma ngabe bakholelwa yiluphi uhlobo lomcabango wezombusazwe). “Mayelana nokulethwa kwezinsiza kanye nezenhlalakahle, uKhongolose wenze kangcono kunanjengoba abantu beqonda”, kusho uCronje ngenyanga kaJanuwari – ekwenza lokhu kungabinhlobo namqondo kubantu ababhikilisha ezindaweni cishe ezingu35 ezahlukahlekene ezweni lonke, eziyisihlanu yazo ngosuku ‘’eziba nodlame’’ ngokusho kombiko ‘’wezingozi zeGatheringa Act’’ ezisuke ziqoqwe ngumbutho wamaphoyisa (ngokwami lokhu kubonakala njengomunye osebenza kakhulu ecubungula ngemibhikisho engathi ayifiki yonke imibiko evela kumbutho wamaphoyisa).Kodwa uCronje watshela iphephandaba iBusiness Day ngoJanuawari ukuthi kunemibhikisho emincane kakhulu kunemine ngosuku. Ngase ngumbuza ngokungabikhona kokubika ngokuneqiniso kombutho wamaphoyisa, kodwa akabange esaphendula.

Futhi ngonyaka ka2012 uCronje wamemezela ukuthi ‘’isibalo sezakhamizi zaseNingizimu Afrika eziphila ngaphansi kwamadola amabili ngosuku sesehlile kusukela kumaphesenti angu12 ngonyaka ka1994, futhi safinyelela kumaphesenti angu17 ngonyaka ka2002, kwehla kwaze kwafika kumaphesenti angu5 namhlanje”.Ngenyanga edlule, ngisho iStas SA yavuma ukuthi isibalo simi kumaphesenti angu46. Ngokukhulu ukuhlonipha ngaphinda ngambuza uCronje ngokungahambisani kwalemibono; waqhubeka futhi, wathula.

Ngokweqiniso, kunodaba oluhle kakhulu mayelana nomgomo wezenhlalakahle waseNingizimu Afrika: selinyukile izinga leminyaka yokuphila kusukela kwiminyaka engu52 iya kwengu61 eminyakeni eyishumi edlule. Kodwa lempumelelo ngeke uhulumeni athi ngungenxa yawo. Ngaphandle komzabalazo weTreatment Action Campaign owaqala kusaqala unyaka ka199, izgidi eziyisithupha zezakhamizi zaseNingizimu Afrika ngabe azibanga nethemba lokuthola imishanguzo esize izimpilo zawo. Abantu ababediniwe bephila nesandulela ngculazi balwela izimpilo zabo bemelene nomgomo wezwelonke wezempilo ‘’owabulala iningi labantu’ ngalesosikhathi ngaphansi kwabaphathi beMedical Research Council (usolwazi uMalegapuru Makgoba), kanye (noKgosi Letlape) weSouth African Medical Association (Kgosi Letlape) kanye nohlaka lwezempilo lwePan Africanist Congress ngaphansi (kukaCosta Gazi).

Impi yokulwela imishanguzo yengculazi yamahala yanqotshwa yizishoshovu zimelene nezimboni zeBig Pharma, uhulumeni kaBill Clinton-noAl Gore eWashington, iWorld Trade Organization, amalungelo olwazi (phecelezi intellectual property rights) kanye nobuholi bukaKhongolose ngaphansi kukaThabo Mbeki, ungqongqoshe wezempilo uManto Tshabalala Msimang kanye nongqongqoshe wezohwebo uAlec Erwin. Lolu yilona daba
oluhle impela okufanele lwaziwe, okuyizindaba ezinhle kakhulu eziqhamuka eNingizimu Afrika kusukela ngoApreli ngonyaka ka1994. Kodwa-ke umbuzo onomqondo uyalandela: mangaki amalunga ekhabhinethi kaZuma njengamanje akwazi ukumelana noMbeki ngesikhathi kubalulekile? Hmmm.

Ngakho-ke ezempilo zaseNingizimu Afrika zikulelizinga ngenxa yokulwa kwabantu, kodwa bese kuthi ababusi bazame ukuzikhinyabeza. Ngokwesibonelo-nje, mase kuza kuhlelo oludingeka kakhulu lweNational Health Insurance olwathenjiswa uKhongolose ngo2007 ngesikhathi sengqungquthela yeqembu elubusayo ePholokwane futhi lokhu kwenziwa ngokungagculisi kumaprojekti amancane ezindaweni lapho kuhlala khona abanhlwempu kakhulu bakuleli, futhi singakhomba Isikhwama Sezwe njengabantu abacekela phansi loluhlelo. Ngabe imalini ungqongqoshe wezezimali uPravin Gordhan azibhekisa ukusiza ungqongqoshe uAaron Motsoaledi ekuqedeni umshuwalense wobandlululo ngezempilo. Ayikho nhlobo.

Kunezindlela eziningi lapho iSikhwama Sezimali Sezwe siluqala kabusha ubandlululo ngamazinga okuphila – ngokwesibonelo lokho bakwenza ngentela, ngemigomo enzuzo, ngokwenza kubelula ukuphuma kwezimali kuleli, ukwehlisa intela kwizimboni, ukulandwa kqezimpahla zokwakha emazweni angaphandle kanye nokwakha izizinda ezingenambuyiselo (phecelezi white elephants infrastructure) – ngokho-ke akethusi ukwazi ukuthi ngokweWorld Economic Forum kulemyaka emibili edlule, abasebenzi baseNingizimu Afrika ibona abaziwa umhlaba wonke njengababhikilisha kakhulu. Nokwazi ukuthi kungekudala-nje iPricewaterhouseCoopers isanda kuthula umbiko wokuthi ongxiwankulu baseNingizimu Afrika ibona abakhwabanisa ukudlula umhlaba wonke. Nokuthi-ke iBhange Lomhlaba libala ukuthi iNingizimu Afrika ilona elihamba phambili emhlabeni wonke ngokuba namazinga aphezulu okungalingani kwabantu.

Isibhicongo saseMarikana kwakungomunye umbhikilisho wezinkulungwane, iziteleka kanye nokubhekana ngodlame nombutho wamaphoyisa ozimisele ngokuthatha amagxathu abanzi ukuvikela izimpahla zenkulumbuso kanye nezababusi bakahulumeni. Usuqala-nje lonyaka, ababhililishi abayisishagalolunye babulawa ngokuthi badutshulwe’. Emihlanu yalemibhikilisho lapho abantu bafa kwakusezindaweni eziseduze naseMarikana, lapho izishoshsovu zazibhekene nombutho wamaphoyisa asalindele ukujeziswa ngokutshelwa ukuthi awabulale abasebenzi abangu34 (balimaza abasebenzi abangu78), atshala nobufakazi phezu kwezidumbu futhi ahlukumeza nabasebenzi basezimayini abangu44 ababeboshiwe.

Umangebe uKhongolose uqhubeka nokuqhosha ngemigomo yawo yezenhlalakahle ngaphandle koshintsho olunenguquko ecace ngokwanele, kuzolokhu kuqhubekile ukuba khona kwemibhikilisho enodlame ngisho nangesikhathi esizayo. Imigomo yezenhlalakahle yongxiwankulu yokwezelela ukulutha abantu kaKhongolose, kanye nemigomo kazwelonke yomnotho engaphumelelanga, ivumele ukuthi uukubandlululwa ngebala kushintshwe kube ukubandlululwa ngezinga lempilo kuleminyaka engamashumi amabili. Kodwa-ke inhlangano entsha emelene nobandlululo ikhula ngesivinini: umzabalazo omelene nokubandlululwa ngamazinga empilo okungenzeka ube nomphumela kakhulu.

[UPatrick Bond usanda kubhala incwadi entsha kanye noJohn Saul) ethi South Africa:The present as history (eshicilelwe nguJames Currey and Jacana publishers, 2014)

 cast your net a little wider...
 Radical Philosophy 
 African Studies Association (USA)  
 New Dawn Engineering 
 Indymedia Radio 
 Southern Africa Report online 
 Online Anti Apartheid Periodicals, 1960 - 1994 
 Autonomy & Solidarity 
 New Formulation 
 We Write 
 International Journal of Socialist Renewal 
 Journal of African Philosophy 
 British Library for Development Studies 
 The Nordic Africa Institute Online Library 
 Political Economy Research Institute Bulletin (PERI) 
 Feminist Africa 
 Jacques Depelchin's Tribute to Harold Wolpe 
 African Studies Quarterly 
 The Industrial Workers of the World 
 Anarchist Archives 
 Wholewheat Radio 
 Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa  
 Zanon Workers 
 Public Citizen  
 Open Directory Project 
 Big noise films 
 London Review of Books  
 New York Review of Books 
 Monthly Review 
 New Left Review 
 Bureau of Public Secrets  
 Zed Books 
 Pluto Press 
 Duke University Press  
 Abe Books 
 The Electric Book Company 
 Project Guttenberg 
 Newspeak Dictionary 
 Feral Script Kiddies 
 Go Open Source 
 Source Forge 
 Ubuntu Linux Home Page 
 Software for Apple Computers 

|  Contact Information  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy